<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.soc-geogr.net/inc/sg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Social Geography</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.soc-geogr.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1729-4274</issn>
		<eissn>1729-4312</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/sg-3-23-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.soc-geogr.net/3/23/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.soc-geogr.net/3/23/2008/sg-3-23-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.soc-geogr.net/3/23/2008/sg-3-23-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>23</start_page>
	<end_page>36</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-06-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Barjak</name>
			<email>franz.barjak@fhnw.ch</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Robinson</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">School of Business, University of Applied Sciences, Olten, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">empirica, Gesellschaft für Kommunikations- und Technologieforschung mbH, Bonn, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The combination of knowledge and skills from different backgrounds or
research cultures is often considered good for science. This paper describes
the extent to which academic research teams in the life sciences draw on
knowledge from different research cultures and how this is related to their
research performance. We distinguish between international collaboration of
research teams from different countries and cultural diversity of research
teams resulting from team members with different countries of origin. Our
results show that the most successful teams have a moderate level of
cultural diversity; in addition, successful teams engage in collaboration
activities with teams from other European countries and the US leading to
joint publications. These results have implications for research team
management and for research policy, in particular in relation to supporting
measures for mobile scientists.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., and Stephan, E.: Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999, Res. Policy, 34, 3, 259–285, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Andrews, F. M. (Ed.): Scientific productivity, the effectiveness of research groups in six countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Arora, A., David, P. A., and Gambardella, A.: Reputation and competence in publicly funded science: estimating the effects on research group productivity, Annales d&apos;Economie et de Statistique, 49/50, 163–198, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Auriol, L.: Labour Market Characteristics and International Mobility of Doctorate Holders: Results for Seven Countries (STI Working paper No. 2007/2), OECD, Paris, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Baird, L. L.: What characterizes a productive research department?, Res. High. Educ., 25, 211–225, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Barjak, F.: Team diversity and research collaboration in life sciences teams: does a combination of research cultures pay off? University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, 2006a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Barjak, F.: The role of networking in research activities, Deliverable 1.3: Doctoral students in the life sciences, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten http://www.netreact-eu.org/documents/NetreactDeliverable1.3.pdf (download 17-03-2008), 2006b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Bland, C. J. and Ruffin, M. T.: Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review, Acad. Med., 67, 385–397, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C.: Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity, Scientometrics, 63, 1, 87–120, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Bordons, M. and Gomez, I.: Collaboration networks in science, in: The web of knowledge: a Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by: Cronin, B. and Atkins, H. B., Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ, USA, 197–213, 2000 </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M., Zulueta, M. A., and Mendez, A.: Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37, 2, 279–295, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Bordons, M. and Zulueta, M. A.: Comparison of research team activity in two biomedical fields, Scientometrics, 40, 3, 423–436, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Borgman, C. and Furner, J.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci., 36, 3–72, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Bunderson, J. S. and Sutcliffe, K. M.: Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects, Acad. Manage. J., 45, 5, 875–893, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, K.: Regression analysis of count data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Carayol, N. and Nguyen Thi, T. U.: Why do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research?, http://cournot2.u-strasbg.fr/users/beta/publications/2004/2004-17.pdf (download 07-06-2005), 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Cesaroni, F. and Gambardella, A.: Research productivity and the allocation of resources in publicly funded research programmes, in: Science and innovation rethinking the rationales for funding and governance, edited by Geuna, A., Salter, A., and Steinmueller, W. E., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, 202–232, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Cohen, J. E.: Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in 3 biomedical-research institutions, Scientometrics, 3, 6, 467–487, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Crawford, E., Shinn, T., and Sörlin, S.: The nationalization and denationalization of the sciences: an introductory essay, in: Denationalizing science: the contexts of international scientific practice, edited by Crawford, E., Shinn, T. and Sörlin, S., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1–42, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Cronin, B.: The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Taylor Graham, London, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Cummings, J. N.: Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization, Manage. Sci., 50(3), 352–364, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Earley, C. and Mosakowski, E.: Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning, Acad. Manage. J., 43, 1, 26–49, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> European Commission: Towards a European research area, COM(2000) 6, http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/pdf/am509774CEE_EN_E4.pdf (download 30 Nov 2006), 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> European Commission: A mobility strategy for the European Research Area, COM(2001) 331 final, http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/docs/Com_2001_331_en.pdf (download 30 Nov 2006), 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> European Commission: Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 2003 – Towards a knowledge-based economy, European Commission, Brussels, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> European Commission: COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 11 March 2005 on the European Charter for Researchers and on a Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers, http://europa.eu.int/eracareers/pdf/C(2005)576%20EN.pdf (download 25 Mar 2006), 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Fiol, C. M. and O&apos;Connor, E. J.: Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions, Organ. Sci., 16, 1, 19–32, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Fox, M. F.: Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review, Soc. Stud. Sci., 13, 283–305, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Georghiou, L.: Global cooperation in research, Res. Policy, 27, 6, 611–626, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Glänzel, W.: National Characteristics in International Scientific Co-authorship Relations, Scientometrics, 51, 1, 69–115, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A.: Double Effort = Double Impact? A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry, Scientometrics, 50, 2, 199–214, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Greene, W. H.: Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, [1993]2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Hagstrom, W.: The scientific community, Basic books, New York, 1965. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Harsanyi, M. A.: Multiple authors, multiple problems – bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review, Library and Information Science Research, 15, 325–354, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Herbertz, H.: Does it pay to collaborate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 33, 1, 117–122, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Hoch, P. and Platt, J.: Migration and the denationalization of science, in: Denationalizing science: the contexts of international scientific practice, edited by: Crawford, E., Shinn, T., and Sörlin, S., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 133–152, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Hollingsworth, J. R. and Hollingsworth, E.: Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures, http://www.umu.se/inforsk/universitetsligan/hollingsworth.html (download 8 Mar 2005), 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A.: Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups, Admin. Sci. Quart., 44, 4, 741–763, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Jöns, H.: Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften: Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive, Department of Geography, Heidelberg, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Jöns, H.: Internationale Mobilität von Wissen und Wissensproduzenten, in: GrenzWerte. Tagungsbericht und wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen. 55. Deutscher Geographentag Trier 2005, edited by: Kulke, E., Monheim, H.. and Wittmann, P., DGFG, Berlin, Leipzig, Trier, 151–160, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Johnston, R.: Effects of resource concentration on research performance, High. Educ., 28, 25–37, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Knorr, K. D., Mittermeir, R., Aichholzer, G., and Waller, G.: Leadership and group performance: a positive relationship in academic research teams, in: Scientific productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries, edited by: Andrews, F. M., Cambridge University Press and Unesco, Cambridge and Paris, 95–120, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Larédo, P. and Mustar, P.: Laboratory Activity Profiles: An Exploratory Approach, Scientometrics, 47, 3, 515–539, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Lau, D. C. and Murnighan, J. K.: Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups, Acad. Manage. Rev., 23, 2, 325–340, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Laudel, G.: Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate, Int. J. Technol. Manage., 22, 7/8, 762–781, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Li, J. and Hambrick, D.: Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams, Acad. Manage. J., 48, 794–813, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Leeuwen, T. N. v., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., and Raan, A. F. J. v.: Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 51, 1, 335–346, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Mattsson, H.: Mobile talent or privileged sites? Making sense of biotech knowledge worker mobility and performance in Sweden, Soc. Geogr., 2, 115–123, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Moguérou, P. and Di Pietrogiacomo, M. P.: Integrated Information System on European Researchers II. Deliverables 1, 2 &amp; 3 (final) WP 1, 2 &amp; 3: Indicators on researchers&apos; stock, career and mobility, European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/pdf/indicators_on_researchers_en.pdf (download 7 Mar 2008), 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Narin, F., Stevens, K., and Whitlow, E. S.: Scientific collaboration in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers, Scientometrics, 21, 313–323, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> National Science Board: Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> National Science Board: Science and Engineering Indicators 2004, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Persson, O., Glänzel, W., and Dannell, R.: A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium, Scientometrics, 55, 3, 335–348, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Raan, A. v.: The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments, Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 12, 1, 20–29, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Ramesh Babu, A. and Singh, Y. P.: Determinants of research productivity, Scientometrics, 43, 309–329, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Seglen, O. and Aksnes, D. W.: Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research, Scientometrics, 49, 1, 125–143, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Simonton, D. K.: Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Stankiewicz, R.: The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance, in: Scientific productivity: the effectiveness of research groups in six countries, edited by: Andrews, F. M., Cambridge University Press and Unesco, Cambridge and Paris, 191–222, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Stephan, E. and Levin, S. G.: Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated, Popul. Res. Policy Rev., 20, 1, 59–79, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="60" content_type="text"> Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., and Zanutto, E.: Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance, Group Decis. Negot., 12, 3, 217–241, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="61" content_type="text"> Thelwall, M.: Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic web sites, J. Inf. Sci., 29, 1, 1–10, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="62" content_type="text"> Thorsteinsdóttir, O. H.: External Research Collaboration in Two Small Science Systems, Scientometrics, 49, 1, 145–160, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="63" content_type="text"> von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Martin, B., and Geuna, A.: The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review, SPRU, Brighton, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="64" content_type="text"> Wagner, C. S.: Six case studies of international collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 62, 1, 3–26, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="65" content_type="text"> Williams, K. Y. and O&apos;Reilly, C. A.: Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 20, 77–140, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="66" content_type="text"> Wray, K.: Is science really a young man&apos;s game?, Soc. Stud. Sci., 33(1), 137–149, 2003. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

