<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.soc-geogr.net/inc/sg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Social Geography</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.soc-geogr.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1729-4274</issn>
		<eissn>1729-4312</eissn>
		<volume_number>1</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/sg-1-5-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/5/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/5/2005/sg-1-5-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/5/2005/sg-1-5-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5</start_page>
	<end_page>14</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-06-08</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Autopoietic spatial systems: the significance of actor network theory and system theory for the development of a system theoretical approach of space</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Koch</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division of Geography, Seminar on Social Geography, University of Munich, Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This article presents a system theoretical approach to space. Basically,
there have been two motivations that led to this approach. Firstly, within
German-speaking social geography, a significant tendency can be recognised
to understand space (spatiality) as solely determined by social factors.
System theory, on the other hand, replaces this causal thinking with a
reciprocal relationship of sociality and spatiality. Secondly, several
attempts to integrate spatiality into the theory of systems remain
unconvincing in certain parts. Even Luhmann, whose work formed the basis of
my approach attributed only marginal significance to space in social
systems.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thus the paper deals with the difficulty of exclusively socially determined
spatiality. In line with Flusser&apos;s &quot;modes of translation&quot; I suggest a way to
overcome this difficulty. Flusser&apos;s ideas point directly and unsurprisingly
to actor network theory (ANT), because here, too, the concept of translation
is crucial. The concept of translation enables us to understand the results
of relationships between social and spatial systems as hybrid phenomena.
Moreover, ANT provides an interesting conceptual approach to space which
will be interpreted from a system theoretical point of view.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One important outcome emerging from linking ANT and system theory is a
symmetrical, mutually dependent relationship between the social construction
of spatiality and spatial construction of sociality. However, the core
implication is to focus on the results of these associative relations: the
socio-spatial hybrid settings. Discussing several characteristics of spatial
systems and their connection with social systems, the paper offers some
suggestions concerning the influence of information and communication
technologies on generating new kinds of spaces.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

