<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.soc-geogr.net/inc/sg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Social Geography</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.soc-geogr.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1729-4274</issn>
		<eissn>1729-4312</eissn>
		<volume_number>1</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/sg-1-15-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/15/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/15/2005/sg-1-15-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.soc-geogr.net/1/15/2005/sg-1-15-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>15</start_page>
	<end_page>27</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-06-08</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">&quot;Wo der Standort trompetet, geht die Freiheit flöten&quot;: Bilder interurbanen Wettbewerbs am Beispiel der Bewerbung Leipzigs zur &quot;Candidate City&quot; für die Olympischen Spiele 2012</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Meyer zu Schwabedissen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Miggelbrink</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde e.V., Schongauerstr. 9, 04329 Leipzig, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Taking the (well-known) thesis of growing interurban and interregional
competition (Harvey) as a starting point, the article explores some of the
pictures by which interurban competition is illustrated. Two lines of
arguments are unfolded: Firstly, competition is regarded as a hegemonic
discourse, that means that &quot;...competitiveness is automatically invoked
anyway as the unchallengeable and &quot;natural&quot; explanation for what is about to
happen&quot; (Schoenberger, 1998:5). And secondly, the economic discourse is
widened and transposed beyond the narrow &quot;nucleus of the economy&quot;: &quot;Not
only firms, but also nations, cities, and localities are enjoined to be more
competitive if they wish to prosper&quot; (Sheppard, 2000:169). As a case study
we analyse the representation of Leipzig bidding (nationally resp.
internationally) for the status as a candidate city for the Olympic Games
2012. The emphasis is on spatial metaphors circulating in public
communication, i.e. pictures which illustrate the actually abstract idea of
interurban competition in a very catchy and neat fashion. One of the most
important motifs is taken from sports itself: cities are depicted as
athletes taking part in a sporting competition (e.g. a race). Ideas as
&quot;fair play&quot; and &quot;being the winner&quot; etc. frame the public representation
of cities in a very specific way. Inevitably, there has to be a symbolic
system placing the cities on &quot;their position&quot;. This is taken from the idea
of being (or not being) a &quot;world-city&quot; - or at least an &quot;European
metropole&quot;.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

